Back to Home
Case Study

AI Agent Product Experiment

An experimental project designed to evaluate the real-world capability of AI coding agents in building a complex, animation-heavy, multi-feature product with minimal manual intervention.

AI AgentsExperimentFrontend EngineeringHuman-AI Collaboration
Explore
Romantic web app interface with pink and heart theme

Overview

Designed a feature-rich Valentine’s interactive app and delegated implementation primarily to an AI coding agent.

Evaluated AI performance across UI generation, animation logic, state management, and responsiveness.

Minimized direct code writing to supervision, debugging, architectural correction, and prompt iteration.

Role

Human Supervisor / Product Architect

Duration

1 hour

Platform

Web

Stack

React (Vite), Tailwind CSS, Framer Motion, Supabase

The Challenge

Can modern coding agents build cohesive, production-level front-end applications?

How much human intervention is required for animation-heavy, stateful apps?

Where does AI break: architecture, performance, edge cases, or design coherence?

  • AI-generated code often lacked structural consistency across modules.
  • Animations required refinement beyond initial generation.
  • State persistence logic needed manual architectural correction.
  • Performance optimization was not handled autonomously.

Process & Timeline

1 hour

Designing, Building, Launch

Mostly build using Claude Code

Key Screens

home screen

Home page

our story page

Our story page

love letter page

Love letter page

reasons page

Reasons page

bucket list page

Bucket list page

virtual gift page

Virtual gift page

Results & Impact

~95%

AI Code Contribution

Initial draft generation

~10% of codebase

Manual Refactor

Architecture + bug fixes

8

Feature Modules

All functional with supabase backend

Key Learnings

AI excels at generating small, modular components but is weak at designing long-term system architecture.

Prompt quality directly influences structural integrity.

AI-generated animation code often requires manual performance tuning.

Supervision and reading code is more valuable than direct coding in AI-augmented workflows.

  • The future developer is an AI orchestrator.
  • Specification clarity > coding speed.
  • Architecture remains a human advantage.
  • AI increases leverage, not autonomy.

Interested in working together?

I'm open to new projects and collaborations.