An experimental project designed to evaluate the real-world capability of AI coding agents in building a complex, animation-heavy, multi-feature product with minimal manual intervention.

Designed a feature-rich Valentine’s interactive app and delegated implementation primarily to an AI coding agent.
Evaluated AI performance across UI generation, animation logic, state management, and responsiveness.
Minimized direct code writing to supervision, debugging, architectural correction, and prompt iteration.
Role
Human Supervisor / Product Architect
Duration
1 hour
Platform
Web
Stack
React (Vite), Tailwind CSS, Framer Motion, Supabase
Can modern coding agents build cohesive, production-level front-end applications?
How much human intervention is required for animation-heavy, stateful apps?
Where does AI break: architecture, performance, edge cases, or design coherence?
1 hour
Mostly build using Claude Code

Home page

Our story page

Love letter page

Reasons page

Bucket list page

Virtual gift page
~95%
AI Code Contribution
Initial draft generation
~10% of codebase
Manual Refactor
Architecture + bug fixes
8
Feature Modules
All functional with supabase backend
AI excels at generating small, modular components but is weak at designing long-term system architecture.
Prompt quality directly influences structural integrity.
AI-generated animation code often requires manual performance tuning.
Supervision and reading code is more valuable than direct coding in AI-augmented workflows.
I'm open to new projects and collaborations.